The side note when learning to read smaller is definitely better.
The ideal situation is learning to read one on one. That's how I taught my kids to read. You can fit there with them and spend as much time as you need. But really it should only take fifteen or twenty minutes a day.
Of course.Not all kids are lucky enough to have that
One on one is best small groups. Next and then larger classes.
I think stubenville, ohio is a great example of how effective small groups can be
I just had a great conversation with Linda Diamond, the author of Teaching Reading, the CORE sourcebook. A list of curriculum is being compiled. She is more than happy to help.
Linda is lovely and passionate, but I don't think people involved in the authoring of curricula are the people to tap on these efforts. Conflicts of interest should be avoided, I suspect the field would agree.
I love this idea.
The side note when learning to read smaller is definitely better.
The ideal situation is learning to read one on one. That's how I taught my kids to read. You can fit there with them and spend as much time as you need. But really it should only take fifteen or twenty minutes a day.
Of course.Not all kids are lucky enough to have that
One on one is best small groups. Next and then larger classes.
I think stubenville, ohio is a great example of how effective small groups can be
https://www.apmreports.org/story/2025/02/20/steubenville-ohio-reading-success-for-all
I just had a great conversation with Linda Diamond, the author of Teaching Reading, the CORE sourcebook. A list of curriculum is being compiled. She is more than happy to help.
Linda is lovely and passionate, but I don't think people involved in the authoring of curricula are the people to tap on these efforts. Conflicts of interest should be avoided, I suspect the field would agree.