Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Julie Lewis's avatar

While I appreciate what you do, the way dyslexia is reported can be misleading. The study recently published by Stanford used the seeing stars program published by Lindamood Bell. The students in the study each received one to one intensive instruction four hours per day over the course of 160 hours. Anyone would be shocked if no, or a little progress had been noted in these students. However, the study did not report that the gap was closed, they reported that it was partially closed. If you read the actual publication of the study and one of the nature magazines, it is obvious we need more research on this and it is acknowledged that while the visual word form area is significantly implicated in dyslexia, it is very likely not the only portion of the reading circuit that is implicated and dyslexia. Finally, I like to point out that if we take any human endeavor or activity, individuals will follow along, continuum with respect to the ease with which they are able to complete the activity and with Respect to their degree of success with the activity. Not everyone will become a virtuoso on the violin, not everyone will become a successful Olympic athlete. We like to believe that given intensive supports everyone can improve in a given area but promises of curing something, completely closing the gap, completely catching people up are dangerous to make

No posts

Ready for more?